Heritage Foundation’s Morning Bell: New Year’s Resolutions for Conservatives
~
Also: Morning Bell: Voter ID Prevents Election Fraud (yet the Democrats, Obama, and his DOJ led by A.G. Holder are doing everything they can to stop it, compromising one of our most valued rights as Americans, and their excuses in doing so are absurd!)
“Last night’s nail-biter in Iowa marked the beginning of election year 2012. And with Americans heading to the polls — next in New Hampshire, then South Carolina and beyond — they will hope to rely on the integrity of the election system to ensure that every legitimate vote counts and that fraud is not the deciding factor on the local, state or national level. Unfortunately, despite all the technological advances in our modern democracy, voter fraud still occurs, and yet there is still resistance to one very simple tool that …” More
Debating Tea Party’s Role in 2012 (CLICK TO WATCH)
Great interview with Matt Kibbe and David Webb, if only they had corrected the news anchor on one point: The Tea Party is not anti-establishment per se and this is important to point out because that is so often defined as meaning anti-government. We support our government when not corrupt, when not off the rails, when small, limited, and operating within it’s delegated powers, and it’s defined purpose, therefore functioning properly. Unlike some fringe elements out there, we do not support anarchy, and where we are most certainly anti-judicial fiat/dictat, we support American jurisprudence and the “proper” rule of law.
Some amount of government is necessary in any civilized society, and as the ancient Greeks found, “without law there can be no freedom”. Then again the ancient romans made some observations such as Cicero “the more laws the less justice” and Tacitus “the more corrupt the state, the more it legislates”. (The latter statement reminds us one one of the great, and few, 20th century constitutionalist Presidents, Calvin Coolidge. He would proclaim that “It is more important to kill bad bills than to pass good ones”. He helped reverse in his day much of the progressivism of Presidents Wilson and TR Roosevelt, the latter whom we are reminded that President Obama recently tried to channel in his miserable attempt to further his aims of class warfare.)
Back to the point, The beauty of America, and our founders, is that they took all such knowledge of the history of the world and it’s various goverments, and with wisdom, and a strict adherence to divine guidance, they found the right balance, checks and balances throughout the entire American system to be specific, and they gave us the means to protect and preserve such.
With no kings, no royalty (ie. no ruling class), no dictorial powers able to amass in any particular branch of government, and most importantly with said checks and balances instilled throughout every level of government and society (between the 3 branches of fed gov, between fed gov and state gov, between all gov and the people, between the people and the people), they gave us the ability to be civilized, be free, and to achieve maximum individual liberty. It was for these very reasons they not only rejected the obvious forms of government, but that they also rejected forming a Democracy (a consistently failed experiment in mob rule).
Considering the role of political parties in America provides for similar thought. Where George Washington warned us of the perils of such (specifically when not checked and balanced), he and others also recognized they would always exist in the same sense that government must, as long as properly limited. So long as parties are two sides of the same American coin, they provide for the debate and representative process that carries our nation forward. It is today however, after many years of politicos playing games on the proverbial slippery slope, that one must wonder, especially though not exclusively with the Democrats, what coin are you the other side of – a Greek? a Soviet? a Chinese? perhaps a 1930′s German one? or a Euro?, to name a few. Of course the same can be asked of many office holders, unfortunately including our President, exactly what country are you trying to turn us into?
So you see, unlike some in this country who are unhappy with our present dismay and decline, and who are either fine with dictorial powers and un-american forms of governance so long as it benefits them, or who have relegated themselves to wanting to take down goverment altogether resulting in chaos and anarchy, it is the Tea Party that strives to simply reign in goverment, restore it to it’s proper role, and see it once again be Constitutionally adherent – which is what for over 200 years has made America not only exceptional but the greatest nation and free-est prople on earth.
It is not the Tea Party that seeks another civil war, God forbid, but rather to prevent one. It is not the Tea Party that seeks another revolution (which again God forbid, for if so – it would probably more resemble the French rev than the American one). No, if the Tea Party can be said to be revolutionary it is because we believe in the principles set forth from the original and we continue in that struggle to see it through. We recognize that the Tree of Liberty was planted at that time and through the devotion, the toils, and the sacrifice, our forefathers and mothers, they saw it to fruition for us. Now today it is we who seek not to abandon it or replace it, but rather to continue to protect and nuture it, so that generations to come may also benefit from the blessings of it’s fruit, as have we!
To reinforce these sentiments check out the following graphics and then re-familiarize with this video (pay special attention to the segment on anarchy which seems largely at play today, here at home, and abroad):
and one more video, that speaks volumes: Democrat Fail Video!
Finally, thank you to whomever produced this:
Occupy Party vs Tea Party Comparison:
President Obama says they are the same. Really? The Democrats endorsed party, the Occupy Party. The Republican endorsed party, the Tea Party.
The Democrats and the liberal media have said that the Occupy Party was a civic group “just like” the Tea Party.
I report……you decide…….
|
REPORTED |
OCCUPY PARTY |
TEA PARTY |
|
ARRESTS |
4149+ |
0 |
|
RAPES |
12 |
0 |
|
DAMAGE |
$10,000,000.00 |
$0 |
|
PUBLIC DEFECATION |
YES |
NO |
|
ANTISEMITIC RANTS |
12 |
0 |
|
COST TO TAXPAYERS ( by 11/9) |
$19,327,487.00+ |
$0 |
|
PUBLIC MASTURBATION |
3 |
0 |
|
MOLOTOV COCKTAILS THROWN |
10 |
0 |
|
FIGHTS STARTED |
YES |
NO |
|
CHILDREN EXPLOITED |
YES |
NO |
|
POLICE CARS DAMAGED |
2 |
0 |
|
PUBLIC DRUNKENNESS |
YES |
NO |
|
DRUG POSSESSION ARREST |
YES |
NO |
|
CONCEALED WEAPON ARREST |
YES |
NO |
|
DRUG OVERDOSE |
YES |
NO |
|
THEFTS |
YES |
NO |
|
BURGLARIES |
YES |
NO |
|
VANDALISM ARREST |
YES |
NO |
|
TRESPASSING ARREST |
YES |
NO |
|
NON FATAL SHOOTINGS |
1 |
0 |
|
PUBLIC URINATION |
YES |
NO |
|
URINATION ON OTHERS |
YES |
NO |
|
ISRAELI FLAGS BURNED |
2 |
0 |
|
AMERICAN FLAGS BURNED |
1 |
0 |
|
AMERICAN FLAGS DANCED ON |
1 |
0 |
|
AMERICAN FLAG DESECRATION |
25 |
0 |
|
FELONY ASSAULT ON AN EMT |
1 |
0 |
|
HEAD/BODY LICE OUTBREAKS |
1 |
0 |
|
TUBERCULOSIS OUTBREAKS |
1 |
0 |
|
MURDER |
1 |
0 |
|
SUICIDE |
1 |
0 |
|
SHOTS FIRED AT WHITE HOUSE |
1 |
0 |
|
SCABIES OUTBREAKS |
1 |
0 |
|
OBAMA ENDORSED IT |
YES |
NO |
|
PELOSI ENDORSED IT |
YES |
NO |
|
CAIR ENDORSED IT |
YES |
NO |
|
SOCIALIST PARTY ENDORSED |
YES |
NO |
|
NAZI PARTY ENDORSED |
YES |
NO |
|
MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD ENDORSED |
YES |
NO |
|
COMMUNIST PARTY ENDORSED |
YES |
NO |
|
BIDEN ENDORSED |
YES |
NO |
|
HUGO CHAVEZ ENDORSED |
YES |
NO |
|
BLACK PANTHERS ENDORSED |
YES |
NO |
|
HEZBOLLAH ENDORSED |
YES |
NO |
|
MARXIST UNION ENDORSED |
YES |
NO |
|
9/11 TRUTHER ENDORSED |
YES |
NO |
|
BOLSHEVIK ENDORSED |
YES |
NO |
|
IRAN GOVERNMENT ENDORSED |
YES |
NO |
|
AYATOLLAH ENDORSED |
YES |
NO |
|
NORTH KOREA ENDORSED |
YES |
NO |
|
FARRAKHAN ENDORSED |
YES |
NO |
|
NATION OF ISLAM ENDORSED |
YES |
NO |
SEE THE SIMILARITIES!
In this new year “Remember 9-12″
THE 9 PRINCIPLES: 1. America is good. / 2. I believe in God and He is the Center of my Life. / 3. I must always try to be a more honest person than I was yesterday. / 4. The family is sacred. My spouse and I are the ultimate authority, not the government. / 5. If you break the law you pay the penalty. Justice is blind and no one is above it. / 6. I have a right to life, liberty and pursuit of happiness, but there is no guarantee of equal results. / 7. I work hard for what I have and I will share it with who I want to. Government cannot force me to be charitable. / 8. It is not un-American for me to disagree with authority or to share my personal opinion. / 9. The government works for me. I do not answer to them, they answer to me.
THE 12 VALUES: • Honesty / • Reverence / • Hope / • Thrift / • Humility / • Charity / • Sincerity / • Moderation / • Hard Work / • Courage / • Personal Responsibility / • Gratitude
Did you know? Americans make up half of the world’s richest 1%. According to the article: It only takes $34,000 a year, after taxes, to be among the richest 1% in the world. That’s for each person living under the same roof, including children. (So a family of four, for example, needs to make $136,000.) http://money.cnn.com/2012/01/04/news/economy/world_richest/index.htm
Obama’s Reelection Strategy: Bypass Congress
by Phil Kerpen
He intends to do whatever he can via executive branch agencies.
Will President Obama Fool America Again? American Spectator: I am not surprised that President Obama sees fit to negotiate with the Taliban…. this is the President who was prepared to engage Iran, North Korea, and Venezuela without precondition. … whose administration saw fit to give guns to Mexican drug cartels. This is the President who thought it sensible to give in excess of half a billion dollars to the sinkhole known as Solyndra to manufacture overpriced solar panels no one wanted to buy. This is also the President who has accumulated more debt in less than three years in office than all his predecessors accumulated in 220 years…
Obama to jam new consumer bureau chief down senate’s throat
Read more…
President Obama on Wednesday used his recess appointment powers to name a head for the controversial Consumer Financial Protection Bureau in a move Republican senators said amounted to a constitutional power grab. ”Pushing the limits of his recess appointment powers, President Obama on Wednesday bypassed the Senate to install three members of the National Labor Relations Board and a director for the controversial new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau – moves Republicans said amounted to unconstitutional power grabs. Mr. Obama said the appointments, which he previewed during a campaign-style speech in Ohio, were necessary because Senate Republicans have blocked him at every turn. But in making the move, he rejected three precedents, including two in which he played a part, that would have blocked the appointments.”
In digging a bit deeper it turns out that GOP senators said they believe the bureau as constructed is too powerful and lacks oversight. They want changes including replacing the director position with a multimember board and subjecting the agency’s budget to the congressional appropriations process. Just for the record, last month Richard Cordray was rejected after Democrats failed to achieve the 60 votes they needed to move his nomination forward. The vote was 53 yes, 45 no. At any rate, the Republicans at this point are not arguing about Cordray as a person they are arguing about the seat. The GOP again finds itself arguing process vs policy.
By His Fruits Ye Shall Know Him: Obama’s Subversive Appointments (The Czar files)
A must read!
On Climate Change fraud, Government fostered Junk Science, Cap n Trade scemes and scams, the UN and Agenda 21, these issues have both Federal implications as well as State implications especially in, but not limited to, NY:
U.S. Funds Nearly 50% — $31 Million — of U.N.’s Global Warming Panel The report also found federal funding for global warming had increased by 116 percent between 1993 and 2004, to $5.1 billion. EXCERPTS: The GAO also found that this funding information “was not available in budget documents or on the websites of the relevant federal agencies, and the agencies are generally not required to report this information to Congress.” The report said documents on U.S. financing for the IPCC were “not available in budget documents or on the websites of the relevant federal agencies, and the agencies are generally not required to report this information to Congress.” Conflicting State Department numbers also made it more difficult for the GAO to assemble the data. The GAO “reviewed documents and interviewed officials from federal agencies and IPCC” to reach its findings. A 2005 GAO report entitled “Federal Reports on Climate Change Funding Should Be Clearer and More Complete” found that federal funding for climate change was not adequately accountable. “Congress and the public cannot consistently track federal climate change funding or spending over time,” the report concluded. http://cnsnews.com/news/article/us-taxpayers-cover-nearly-half-cost-un-s-global-warming-panel
Fake! Fake! Fake! Fake! [by S. Fred Singer, professor emeritus at the University of Virginia and director of the Science & Environmental Policy Project. He is a senior fellow of the Heartland Institute and of the Independent Institute. His specialty is atmospheric and space physics. An expert in remote sensing and satellites, he served as the founding director of the U.S. Weather Satellite Service and, more recently, as vice chair of the U.S. National Advisory Committee on Oceans & Atmosphere. He is co-author of Climate Change Reconsidered (2009 and 2011) and of Unstoppable Global Warming (2007)]
“Within the United States, and also elsewhere, global warming scares have become a means of transferring taxpayer money to politically influential cronies. There is now so much “crony capitalism” that it would be difficult to reverse or even stop the ongoing subsidies, outright grants, tax breaks, and other transfers to privileged groups.” “Time is becoming short. We’re reaching a tipping point — not of the earth’s climate, but of the financial schemes that permanently divert funds from productive activities into wasteful ones, all in the name of “saving the climate.” The results are evident: higher levels of spending, deficits, or taxes; higher prices for energy and electricity and therefore for all manufactured goods; less productive activity; less employment; and more misery.”
Progress: Canadian Senate Listens to Global Warming Skeptics Global warming orthodoxy gets challenged in a first-of-its-kind hearing. (Speaking truth to the sun: Perhaps more of our senators should be listening!)
On December 15, four leading scientists appeared before the Canadian Senate Standing Committee on Energy, the Environment and Natural Resources to challenge global warming advocacy. The hearing was the first of its kind in Canada. (Video of the hearing can be found here.)
Guelph University Professor of Economics Dr. Ross McKitrick led off the hearing, explaining that the foundation of the climate scare — the science as promulgated by the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) — cannot be trusted: more…
Related (State news): CHIP: Agenda 21 + Crony Capitalism = The Death of “Home Rule” & Property Rights!
Speaking of NYS:
State of State (SOS): Cuomo talks energy, bridges, gambling – Gambling Fools Espisode 1 – A Governor and the backs of those upon whom he seeks to remedy the state’s fiscal woes!
Back to our National cause:
![]()
A 2012 Conservative Case for America’s Future
By Ken Blackwell & Ken Klukowski on 1.4.12 @ 6:07AM
In other words, it’s a make or break year for constitutional conservatism.
The United States is at a fork in the road regarding which way we will go as a people. The 2012 election could be the most important in our lifetime, and conservative leaders have reached a consensus on how to channel the energy and concerns of the American people to realize historic change this year.
The status quo will not survive the year. Our debt and spending have reached catastrophic proportions in the context of global financial difficulties and political upheaval. Consequently, by the end of 2012, America will either have taken a decisive step toward socialistic collectivism in the name of “equality” and “social justice,” where businesses and owners are punitively taxed to “pay their fair share,” or America will take a major step in the direction of returning to our Founders’ constitutional government, restoring the rule of law, federalism, free enterprise, and individual initiative and responsibility.
The American people will decide which path to take in the 2012 elections, not only in the general election on November 6 but also in the nominating process in primaries over the next several months for all major offices, including the presidency. Conservatives must act in a concerted and informed fashion in all of these contests to shape the public dialogue and thoroughly vet the candidates.
To achieve these ends, top conservative leaders acting under the umbrella of the Conservative Action Project have released “A Conservative Consensus for 2012” announcing agreement on major policies. These issues span all three wings of the conservative movement: economic, social, and national security.
The Conservative Consensus speaks to economic issues of fundamental tax reform, Obamacare, overhauling regulation, and energy production. It tackles social issues of strengthening families and advocating traditional values and religious liberty. And it covers defense issues of protecting the homeland, military superiority, and national sovereignty.
This document also advocates specific issues all conservatives must regard as essential. America needs a strong Balanced Budget Amendment to the U.S. Constitution that caps federal spending. Immediate and drastic cuts to the federal budget. No corporate bailouts. The Second Amendment right to bear arms is a fundamental right, as is voting, so the ballot box must be protected from fraud and corruption. Because voting is also a citizen’s duty, reasonable conditions must be enacted to safeguard our democratic process. And none of these can succeed unless the right people are appointed as judges to our federal courts.
Achieving these goals is a tremendous challenge, and true constitutional conservatives must relentlessly pursue building a true coalition between the three wings of the conservative movement.
This means that true conservatives must not allow anyone to redefine conservatism as only about fiscal issues and the reach of government. Constitutional conservatives understand that strong families are the essential foundation for long-term economic prosperity. The demographic reality is that declining birth rates and rampant abortion creates a devastating loss of human capital that cannot sustain our entitlement systems or economic growth, and also result in millions of unfilled job positions that become a magnet for illegal immigration.
Fortunately most conservatives understand that national security is crucial to America’s success. But some wrongheaded individuals seek to silence or marginalize social issues, oblivious to the profound reality — proven throughout history — that where families crumble there is an unstoppable public outcry for government to fill the void with massive entitlements and programs. Government always grows when families fail.
Some economic leaders with libertarian or liberal beliefs fail to grasp this simple fact, and so pervert the concept of freedom to mean that individuals are free to do whatever they like, free of any concept of right-and-wrong or of personal responsibility or self-control. They willfully ignore our Founding Fathers, who believed that limited government only endures when individuals govern themselves.
Some social conservative leaders are making the same mistake. They were right to reject an unrealistic “truce” on social issues. But some are essentially calling for a truce on economic issues, supporting candidates who stand for traditional values but are not reliably conservative on limiting the size, scope, and cost of government.
While both social and economic issues are indispensable, and both move votes, the reality is that fiscal issues are moving more swing votes in this cycle than value issues. Social conservatives will overreach if they force voters to choose between the two by insisting on traditionalist candidates who are not also warriors for free markets, federalism, fundamental entitlement reform, and a strong Balanced Budget Amendment. Social conservatives must demand equal standing, not superior standing.
A perfect example where all three branches of conservatism can join forces is our national debt. America is now $15 trillion in debt, an unprecedented level exceeding 100% of our Gross Domestic Product. The only time we even approached such a proportion was the end of World War II, where we were in a global war that threatened our very survival as a nation. Instead of a temporary military emergency, our current debt is being fueled by deficits of over $1 trillion every year Barack Obama has been president.
In addition to an economic issue, this debt is a social issue. Our profligate spending is intergenerational theft, saddling each member of the next generation with over $120,000 in debt once they become taxpayers. That’s a mortgage on a house, with no house.
It is also a defense issue. The former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said our national debt is the single greatest threat to national security. We are on track to be paying $600 billion per year just in interest on the national debt, more than our entire military and security budget. This hamstrings our ability to defend our nation today while developing weapons and systems to protect us tomorrow.
Another reality is that constitutional conservatism cannot become our national policy without all three branches of government. If conservatives retake both houses of Congress it can only block bad legislation. Without a two-thirds supermajority, conservatives in Congress cannot override presidential vetoes of good legislation or undo harmful administrative regulations through the Congressional Review Act.
We need a constitutional conservative in the White House. Not all Republicans are part of the solution, and some leading Republicans are even part of the problem. America needs a president who is reliable on fiscal issues, and social issues, and defense issues. Two out of three is not enough. Ronald Reagan was all three, and only a Republican solid on all three bases can pick up President Reagan’s mantle to lead this country through the daunting challenges we face.
In our system of government, none of this will succeed without the right people serving in the federal judiciary. But judges are nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate, so if the American people elect a constitutional conservative president and a Senate willing to fight for judges, there are scores of spectacular lawyers and scholars who are faithful to the original meaning of the Constitution. If we elect the right people, they can take care of the courts.
The courts are imperative for all branches of the conservative movement. In addition to abortion, same-sex marriage and religious liberty, the Supreme Court is deciding all-important economic issues like Obamacare and national security issues like Bill of Rights protections for terrorists captured by our military on foreign battlefields. All conservatives must demand that only principled originalists be nominated to the Supreme Court and lower courts.
So America faces a historic choice. And conservatives face a historic task, of making the case to the voters for how and why constitutional conservatism is the way to return our nation to strength and stability, and electing national leadership that will honestly and definitively tackle these challenges for the sake of our children and grandchildren.

About the Author Ken Blackwell, a board member of the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, is a former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations Human Rights Commission and a senior fellow at the Family Research Council.
About the Author Ken Klukowski is a fellow and senior legal analyst with the American Civil Rights Union.The Left’s “Rights Scam”
The left invariably frames its policy pronouncements under the mantle of so-called “rights” that only the government can guarantee…
Out of this mindset has come the minimum wage laws, the creation of innumerable federal agencies to regulate and monitor all aspects of business, 160,000 pages of federal regulations and a tax code exceeding 80,000 pages, Medicare and Medicaid, an overwhelming litany of various welfare and social programs, Social Security, Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, the creation of seven new presidential cabinet secretaries since Franklin Roosevelt, ObamaCare, federal intrusion into local education matters, the institution of public-sector unions, and the loss of liberty and individual freedom through the unfettered growth of government.
What has this cost the people of the United States? A society at odds with itself while bent on class warfare and self-satisfaction as the future of succeeding generations is made untenable. From a strictly financial perspective, the picture comes into focus by comparing the last fifty years (1962 to 2012, with 1962 inflation adjusted to 2012 dollars).
| 1962 | 2012 | Difference | |
| Total National Debt | $ 2.3 Trillion | $ 15.2 Trillion | $ 12.9 Trillion |
| Debt as a percent of Gross Domestic Product | 50.1% | 100.1% | |
| Total Government Spending (all levels) | $ 1.3 Trillion | $ 6.2 Trillion | $ 4.9 Trillion |
It is projected that by 2016, if no changes are made, the total national debt will be over $21.5 trillion; the debt as a percent of GDP will be in excess of 113%, and overall government spending will exceed $8.0 trillion… More…
by Roger Morse
Senate Democrats have refused to propose a budget for three years.
The US Senate has not passed a budget since April 29th, 2009!
The Last time the United States Senate passed a budget bill was April 29th, 2009. Since that time, the senate has used parliamentary tools like continuing resolutions (CRs), omnibus spending bills, and minibus bills to enact the president’s budget requests.
Sadly, our main stream media (MSM) has failed the American people. The MSM consistently complains about “the congress” and how it needs to “put it’s fiscal house in order.” The US House of Representatives has done just that, every year in fact.
The majority in the senate is very different than the majority in the house. The senate leadership is lacking in every measure. Under Majority Leader Harry Reid’s careful hand, the senate and MSM blames the House as a “do nothing congress” when it is actually the senate that cannot do anything.
So the next time you see someone on CNN , MSNBC , CBS , NBC, ABC , Fox News , or you read a paper or a website that complains about the “do nothing ‘republican’ congress”, realize they mean “Harry Reid and the Democrats in the do nothing senate”.
Harry Reid and the democrat’s failure to produce a budget bill continues…
Sign Our Petition For Congress To Pass A Budget -
As a proud American Taxpayer, I request that Members of the United States Senate pass a complete budget. Everyday citizens are forced to make difficult decisions regarding their finances. Congress, specifically, the US Senate has failed for over 900 days to pass a budget. This is slap in the face of every American! One of the requirements by Congress mentioned in the Constitution is to pass a budget. How hard can it be? Do the right thing and pass a budget!











No college takes its mission, its charter, and its founding principles more seriously than Hillsdale College. This is so because of the leadership of Arnn. He came to Hillsdale by way of Pocahontas, Arkansas, Oxford, and the Claremont Institute. He was the founding chairman of the California Civil Rights Initiative, later led by Ward Connerly. He is not merely an administrator out of touch with and out of reach to those in his charge; on the contrary, he teaches courses to Hillsdale students on subjects such as Aristotle’s Ethics. Again, how many administrators do that in academia today? He is both an homme sérieux and a man with whom it would be fun to share a drink. He is what we wish all of our professors to be. I think you will enjoy studying with him, too.







Historian Peter Lillback, author of “Sacred Fire,” an exhaustive scholarly treatise on George Washington, notes that it is only in recent years, with the searchable digital publication of our Founders’ writings, that we get an accurate picture of their faith, and expression of same.





Now Online:



If you know a soldier who you would like to receive a care package this year, or if you would like to join Blue Star Mothers, contact Rowley at 





The phone cards and PTN are ways deployed troops can stay connected with their family. One hundred percent of the money raised for the USO Operation Phone Home program goes to the purchase of phone cards and operation of the PTN.
The Resource Center has kicked off its campaign to make the holidays brighter for area children and their families…
By Rebecca Hagelin (Archive) · Tuesday, November 22, 2011


























































